STAMP DUTY CHANGES
See below a recent summary of the significant
changes in Stamp Duty announced by the Chancellor last week. These
changes favour very much the lower purchasing ranges and hence the
Chancellor’s claim that 98% of mortgage applicants will be favourably
affected. However most expatriate borrowers purchase at a much higher
value and many of them will be disadvantaged.
We have dealt with Hugh Obbard for many years,
and when it comes to London purchasing our clients have found his sound
advice extremely valuable.

Osborne shoots Balls’s fox.
December
2014
You have to hand it to George Osborne,
he has pulled off a political masterstroke. Having declared emphatically
on Andrew Marr’s BBC show this Sunday that The Tories would not
introduce a Mansion Tax, he has taken all by surprise with a complete
overhaul of the antiquated SDLT rules. The new rulings will mean that
the vast majority of buyers will see a saving on their Stamp Duty (98%
of UK transactions are below £950,000) with the intention that the
shortfall in receipts to HMRC will be picked up by the very wealthy.
The new methodology gets rid of the pricing
bands that had become so resented and introduces a more progressive,
graded system.
The basic changes are as follows;
- Nil SDLT payable at all on purchases up to £125,000
- 2% SDLT payable on the portion up to £250,000
- 5% SDLT payable on the portion up to £925,000
- 10% SDLT payable on the portion up to £1,500,000
- 12% SDLT for the portion thereafter.
The following is an illustration of the
effects up to a purchase of £2.5m.
Basic Table
New SDLT |
|
£ |
% |
|
SAVING |
£175,000 |
|
1000 |
0.6 |
|
£750 |
£200,000 |
|
1500 |
0.8 |
|
£500 |
£250,000 |
|
2500 |
1.0 |
|
£0 |
£300,000 |
|
5000 |
1.7 |
|
£4,000 |
£350,000 |
|
7500 |
2.1 |
|
£3,000 |
£400,000 |
|
10000 |
2.5 |
|
£2,000 |
£450,000 |
|
12500 |
2.8 |
|
£1,000 |
£500,000 |
|
15000 |
3.0 |
|
£0 |
£525,000 |
|
16250 |
3.1 |
|
£4,750 |
£600,000 |
|
20000 |
3.3 |
|
£4,000 |
£700,000 |
|
25000 |
3.6 |
|
£3,000 |
£800,000 |
|
30000 |
3.8 |
|
£2,000 |
£850,000 |
|
32500 |
3.8 |
|
£1,500 |
£900,000 |
|
35000 |
3.9 |
|
£1,000 |
£930,000 |
|
36750 |
4.0 |
|
£450 |
£950,000 |
|
38750 |
4.1 |
|
-£750 |
£1,000,000 |
|
43750 |
4.4 |
|
-£3,750 |
£1,250,000 |
|
68750 |
5.5 |
|
-£6,250 |
£1,400,000 |
|
83750 |
6.0 |
|
-£13,750 |
£1,500,000 |
|
93750 |
6.3 |
|
-£18,750 |
£1,650,000 |
|
111750 |
6.8 |
|
-£29,250 |
£1,750,000 |
|
123750 |
7.1 |
|
-£36,250 |
£2,000,000 |
|
153750 |
7.7 |
|
-£13,750 |
£2,500,000 |
|
213750 |
8.6 |
|
-£38,750 |
For those who want to look at the detail,
please find below a link to HMRC Website
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rates-and-allowances-stamp-duty-land-tax/rates-and-allowances-stamp-duty-land-tax
There has of course been a great deal of
coverage since yesterday’s announcement in the Chancellor’s autumn
statement. Unsurprisingly, given that the average UK house price
stands at around £285,000, most of the reaction has been very positive,
with the new arrangements delivering an outright saving in the SDLT
charge on purchases sub £950,000 (approx.) As a result the UK housing
market is expected to benefit from more demand, more transactions and
consequent upward pressure on prices over the next year or two well
above the levels previously being forecast for this sporadically
recovering segment. However for the 1- 2% who transact over £1.5m
or so, there is no doubt these are fundamental changes which will have
lasting effects. The further one goes up market beyond this level, the
more opinions differ about what happens next.
Looked at pragmatically, the effective
increase in the SDLT rate for properties around the £2 million price
level, for example, is only marginally more (a blended 7.7% rather than
the old 7% which equates to an additional one-off £13,750 charge on the
transaction) and we could rationally expect that the market will absorb
that, however we fully expect some horse-trading renegotiation of prices
immediately to share the burden between buyer and seller before settling
down to accept the new reality.
Further up the chain still and the financial
impact becomes significantly greater. At £10 million the
additional SDLT amounts to a £413,750 increase and the effective rate is
11.14%. At first glance one would suppose this would be a whopping
disincentive for new buyers. However, the pragmatist can point to
comparison with the cost of transacting in other prime real estate
markets such as New York or Paris and reflect that London is simply
being brought more in line having historically been an exceptionally
cheap location for investment/property ownership. We also know
from experience that prime property buyers can be resilient in the face
of transaction costs when there are stronger motivators for their long
term investment strategy/property needs – when the 15% penalty rate of
SDLT was introduced for enveloped properties the conventional view was
that no-one would pay, but in fact many investors preferred to take the
up front hit in order to manage more significant tax or risk exposures
over their holding period, and today’s top slice rate of 12%, whilst far
from welcome, doesn’t look so extreme in comparison.
TRANSACTION VOLUMES WILL BE THE KEY IMPACT.
Residential buyers do not always do the
pragmatic thing, though. There is clearly a short term risk,
actually a likelihood, of a reaction of the kind we saw when rates were
first increased and penalties imposed on enveloped structures back in
early 2012. At that time a kind of emotional shock, and a herd
nervousness, kept buyers on the side lines with optimistic opportunists
predicting an imminent price collapse. That didn’t happen to any
degree, but there was a short period of semi-paralysis as buyer and
seller expectations became mismatched and transactions got suspended.
Over the past few months the upper market had already been noticeably
quietening and cooling as Mansion tax concerns took hold with next May’s
election fast approaching (we referred to this in our last bulletin),
and these new measures will likely only exacerbate this as the market
waits to see the effects.
With the upper end of the market performing so
strongly from 2010 onwards, together with the rises in SDLT introduced
in 2012, the Government has enjoyed a Stamp Duty windfall in recent
years. These new measures are surely going to stifle liquidity at the
top end, something we were already seeing in fact, and it will be
fascinating to compare the SDLT take over the next couple of years with
the last couple. I suspect the result will illustrate how these new
announcements are less about tackling the deficit and more about May
2015.
LOOKING IN THE CRYSTAL BALL
George Osborne will have done his electoral
chances no harm. The old fashioned Tory principle of a home owning
democracy runs deep across the country and house prices remain
inexorably linked to economic performance. These new measures will
undoubtedly provide a big shot in the arm to the domestic housing
market, coming on the back of last year’s Help to Buy scheme. If George
isn’t worried about the UK’s growing debt burden (he announced yesterday
the Government would borrow £91.3bn this year, as opposed to the £86.6bn
he had projected, or £40bn he promised while in opposition!) he probably
wont lose much sleep on rising mortgage debt.
No doubt some very influential people (London
& home counties MPs and party donors?) will be very miffed by the heavy
weighting of SDLT at the upper end, I wonder whether Osborne’s tendency
to play economic diplomacy (give with one hand and take with the other)
will see the next Tory Government introduce their stated goals of top
rate income tax reducing back to 40% and the Inheritance tax threshold
increasing from its current £325,000 to £1m (as had been proposed when
in opposition).
At the very upper end of the market, it is
easy to see how the super wealthy will take this on the chin. After all,
over the past 6-7 years we have seen them be quite willing to accept
prices in the likes of Mayfair, Belgravia & Knightsbridge that have gone
from £1,500psf to £4,500psf. Few at this level are pure investors, the
greater majority buy for personal use.
I feel the £2-£2.5m bracket which had become
so impacted by the old threshold may be less constrained going forward,
although not entirely unaffected . The market that is likely to be most
effected is most probably within the £3m to £6m bracket in affluent
local markets like Wandsworth, Barnes & Chiswick and beyond in places
like the Costwolds. With combined transaction costs before yesterday’s
announcement (buying & Selling) in the order of 10%, we had been seeing
for some time an explosion of basement or roof extensions. Few visiting
London will not have noticed all the various basement hoardings as
owners look to add valuable square footage. Once all the basements have
been built and the loft extensions added (this has more or less been
seen) many owners will feel trapped simply by the cost to move.
The additional SDLT will now add further to
the costs of moving to upgrade or even downgrade (let alone relocate for
job reasons) thus stifling liquidity in the upper end of the domestic
market.
By penalising high value homes, the Government
has further encouraged investors to look towards the market sectors
where the local end user demand/need is greatest. Already in discussions
today, clients have been looking at where their money can be most
effectively and efficiently employed and where Her Majesty’s Revenue and
Customs is not the key beneficiary…..a portfolio of sub £1m flats in
central locations where supply constraints remain looks appealing.
Looking further forward, one other political
result of yesterday’s news is that the Mansion Tax proposals favoured by
Liberal and Labour parties and touted as part of their forthcoming
election pitch is now even less likely to be viable. Uncertainty
about this has hung over the market for a considerable time and it is a
relief to see this being out in the clear and most likely finally put to
bed.
A TIME FOR THE BOLD
Seller’s in the £1.5m plus bracket have
received a hard knock within the last 24 hours. The market which was
already stumbling will most definitely fall in the short term. For those
looking for a ‘blood on the streets’ correction we simply don’t see that
happening, reference to the number of withdrawals from the sales market
in our last bulletin being illustrative of how many ‘sellers’ will play
the long game. However, these measures have most definitely weakened the
sellers positions and buyers now hold a strong hand. The bold will see
opportunity and take advantage of others’ nervousness and vulnerability.
Last time around the bold were right and profited handsomely.
Mortgage Enquiry Form
Back to IMP Homepage |